Johnson v. State

288 S.W. 223, 105 Tex. Crim. 387, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 558
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 Tex. Crim. 417
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 13, 1926·No. No. 10499.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possessing equipment for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without a statement of the facts proven on the trial. Complaint is made by bill of exception No. 1 at the refusal of the court to grant a severance and place one Moore, a co-defendant, upon trial first. The court qualifies the bill by stating that said Moore was a fugitive from justice and had never been arrested. Under such circumstances the court properly refused the request for severance. Art. 651, C. C. P., 1925, Rev., Anderson v. State, 8 Tex. Crim App. 542; Crane v. State, 91 Tex. Crim. Rep. 304, 240 S. W. 920; Moore v. State, 96 Tex. Crim. Rep. 262, 257 S. W. 246.

There are numerous other bills of exception in the record. As presented none of them are believed to show error. It is difficult to appraise bills relating to the admission of evidence without having before us the facts proven on the trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 288 S.W. 223, 105 Tex. Crim. 387, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 558 (Tex. 1926).

288 S.W. 223 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. State
257 S.W. 246 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Crane v. State
240 S.W. 920 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)