Johnson v. State

275 S.W. 1005, 101 Tex. Crim. 410, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 819
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 Tex. Crim. 582
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 7, 1925·No. No. 9357.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for on'e year.

Witnesses for the State found in the possession of the appellant a quantity of liquid called “choc-beer”. Appellant admitted that he made the liquid and gave details as to the method of its manufacture. The State’s witnesses testified that it contained alcohol, was capable of use as a beverage, and if used in practicable quantities would cause intoxication.

We have been favored with no brief for the appellant. We find no bills of exception in the record. The evidence of the State, which we must assume was believed by the jury, is deemed sufficient to support the verdict.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 275 S.W. 1005, 101 Tex. Crim. 410, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 819 (Tex. 1925).

275 S.W. 1005 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.