Johnson v. State

160 S.W. 1197, 71 Tex. Crim. 551, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 514
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 61 Tex. Crim. 104
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 29, 1913·No. No. 2701.·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

The appellant was indicted and convicted of rape on a girl under fifteen years of age, and his punishment fixed at twenty years in the penitentiary.

There is neither a bill of exceptions nor a statement of facts in this case. In the motion for new trial several grounds of it complain of matters that can only be raised and presented by hill of exceptions; and even if there had been bills, they could not properly be considered without a statement of facts. There are none of the other questions attempted to be raised by the motion for a new trial that can be considered in the absence of a statement of facts. The indictment is good, followed the statute and the approved forms.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 160 S.W. 1197, 71 Tex. Crim. 551, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 514 (Tex. 1913).

160 S.W. 1197 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.