Johnson v. State

18 Tex. Ct. App. 7, 1885 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 50
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 Tex. Ct. App. 453
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 11, 1885·No. No. 3296·Published

Opinion

Willson, Judge.

This conviction is for the theft of one barrel of lime of the value of $2. The punishment assessed and adjudged against the defendant is a fine of $1. Theft of property under the value of $20 is punishable “ by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, during which time the prisoner may be put to hard work, and by fine not exceeding $500, or by such imprisonment without fine.” (Penal Code, art. J36.)

Both imprisonment and fine may be imposed, or imprisonment alone may be imposed; but fine without imprisonment is a punish[8]*8ment for this offense not prescribed or authorized by law. Therefore the verdict in this case is contrary to law, and cannot support the conviction. (Fowler v. The State, 9 Texas Ct. App., 149; Sager v. The State, 11 Texas Ct. App., 110.)

Hone of the objections to the conviction raised by the defendant’s assignments of error are well taken. The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

[Opinion delivered April 11, 1885.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 18 Tex. Ct. App. 7, 1885 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 50 (Tex. Ct. App. 1885).

18 Tex. Ct. App. 7 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.