Johnson v. State

30 Tex. 748
Texas Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1868·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Lindsay, J.

This was an indictment for murder charged to have been committed by the appellant. He was found guilty of murder in the first degree, by a jury, upon the evidence and the charge of the court. A reversal is now sought, upon the ground that express malice was not proved by the state, and therefore the verdict wás erroneous. We think there is enough in the testimony adduced upon the trial to show express malice, and we can perceive no such error in the charge of the court as to require our interference with the verdict and judgment of the court below. It is therefore

Asttrmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 30 Tex. 748 (Tex. 1868).

30 Tex. 748 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamm v. State
324 So. 2d 345 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1975)
State v. Yarborough
39 Kan. 581 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1888)
Keiser v. Smith
71 Ala. 481 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1882)