Johnson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Johnson v. State

1955 OK CR 50, 282 P.2d 779, 1955 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 201

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 13, 1955

DocketNo. A-12098

StatusPublished

This text of 1955 OK CR 50 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. State, 1955 OK CR 50, 282 P.2d 779, 1955 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 201 (Okla. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

POWELL, Judge.

Cal Johnson was charged in the county court of Kiowa County with the crime of driving an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, Tit. 47 O.S. A. § 93, was tried before a jury, convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of $25.

No briefs have been filed, and no appearance was made for the defendant when the case was set for oral argument.

We have examined the record and find no error. The evidence to support the verdict was overwhelming. The car driven by the defendant was travelling at a high rate of speed at the time it got out of control and turned over a number of times. The defendant and his passenger, [780]*780both, shown to have been intoxicated, miraculously escaped death. Other motorists were endangered. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Tit. 20 O.S.A.- § 47; Landrum v. State, 96. Okl.Cr. 330, 255 P.2d 291; Berg v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 320, 262 P.2d 913; Pingleton v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 323, 262 P.2d 911.

JONES, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

POWELL, Judge.

Cal Johnson was charged in the county court of Kiowa County with the crime of driving an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, Tit. 47 O.S. A. § 93, was tried before a jury, convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of $25.

No briefs have been filed, and no appearance was made for the defendant when the case was set for oral argument.

We have examined the record and find no error. The evidence to support the verdict was overwhelming. The car driven by the defendant was travelling at a high rate of speed at the time it got out of control and turned over a number of times. The defendant and his passenger, [780]*780both, shown to have been intoxicated, miraculously escaped death. Other motorists were endangered. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Tit. 20 O.S.A.- § 47; Landrum v. State, 96. Okl.Cr. 330, 255 P.2d 291; Berg v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 320, 262 P.2d 913; Pingleton v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 323, 262 P.2d 911.

JONES, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1955 OK CR 50, 282 P.2d 779, 1955 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack