Johnson v. State

1925 OK CR 11, 242 P. 580, 33 Okla. Crim. 189, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 614
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Okla. Crim. 212
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 16, 1925·No. No. A-5221.·Published

Opinion

BESSEY, P. J.

This cause was submitted on the record at the October, 1925, term of this court, and 10 days given to plaintiff in error in which to file brief. No brief has ever been filed.

Under the rules of this court, under such circumstances, the court will examine the record, and if no prejudicial error appears on the face of the record, the information is sufficient, and the evidence sustains the verdict, the cause will be affirmed.

No error appearing, and the evidence being sufficient, *190 and the instructions fair to the plaintiff in error, the cause is affirmed.

DOYLE and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 1925 OK CR 11, 242 P. 580, 33 Okla. Crim. 189, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 614 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

1925 OK CR 11 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.