Johnson v. State
2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 687
Opinion
Held, that the payment shown by the pleadings and the agreed statement of fact, was not voluntary; and, the facts stated in the motion being found to be true, that it should be sustained.
Held, further, that a motion to strike the petition in error from the files, because it was not accompanied by a complete certified transcript, should be sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. State, 2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 687 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1890).
2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 687 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.