Johnson v. State of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Johnson v. State of New York

2017 NY Slip Op 4334, 151 A.D.3d 1140, 52 N.Y.S.3d 918

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 2017

Docket523157

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 4334 (Johnson v. State of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. State of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 4334, 151 A.D.3d 1140, 52 N.Y.S.3d 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Garry, J.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (DeBow, J.), entered March 21, 2016, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the claim.

Claimant, an inmate at Upstate Correctional Facility, filed a claim alleging that, on occasion, prison officials refused to pick up and deliver his law library requests, refused to deliver requested legal supplies and legal mail, and refused to notify maintenance that his cell sink needed to be fixed. In addition to submitting an answer that set forth numerous affirmative defenses, defendant moved to dismiss the claim. After claimant failed to submit any opposition to defendant’s motion, the Court of Claims granted the motion. Defendant appeals.

Having failed to respond in any manner to the motion to dismiss, claimant is precluded from appealing the order (see CPLR 5511). Claimant’s “sole remedy is rather to move to vacate the default order and, if necessary, to appeal from the denial of that motion” (Johnson v State of New York, 140 AD3d 1558, 1558 [2016]; see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Johnson v State of New York, 140 AD3d 1560, 1560 [2016]; Matter of Susan UU. v Scott VV., 119 AD3d 1117, 1118 [2014]). As the record does not reflect that claimant availed himself of that procedure, the appeal is not properly before us.

Peters, P.J., Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garry, J.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (DeBow, J.), entered March 21, 2016, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the claim.

Claimant, an inmate at Upstate Correctional Facility, filed a claim alleging that, on occasion, prison officials refused to pick up and deliver his law library requests, refused to deliver requested legal supplies and legal mail, and refused to notify maintenance that his cell sink needed to be fixed. In addition to submitting an answer that set forth numerous affirmative defenses, defendant moved to dismiss the claim. After claimant failed to submit any opposition to defendant’s motion, the Court of Claims granted the motion. Defendant appeals.

Having failed to respond in any manner to the motion to dismiss, claimant is precluded from appealing the order (see CPLR 5511). Claimant’s “sole remedy is rather to move to vacate the default order and, if necessary, to appeal from the denial of that motion” (Johnson v State of New York, 140 AD3d 1558, 1558 [2016]; see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Johnson v State of New York, 140 AD3d 1560, 1560 [2016]; Matter of Susan UU. v Scott VV., 119 AD3d 1117, 1118 [2014]). As the record does not reflect that claimant availed himself of that procedure, the appeal is not properly before us.

Peters, P.J., Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 4334, 151 A.D.3d 1140, 52 N.Y.S.3d 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack