Johnson v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Johnson v. State

49 A.D.2d 772, 372 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10780

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 11, 1975

DocketClaim No. 52985

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 772 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. State, 49 A.D.2d 772, 372 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

The parties appealed to us from a judgment in favor of claimant, entered [773]*773November 10, 1972, upon a decision of the Court of Claims. We modified the judgment, on the law, by excluding from the award to claimant Fleeter Thorpe the amount representing her medical expenses and compensation for emotional harm (44 AD2d 151). The Court of Appeals has reversed the order entered on our decision and remitted the case to us for a review of the facts (37 NY2d 378). Inasmuch as the State does not raise any issue concerning the factual existence of psychic injury to the claimant and does not contest the amount of the award therefor, the judgment of the Court of Claims must be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondents-appellants. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The parties appealed to us from a judgment in favor of claimant, entered [773]*773November 10, 1972, upon a decision of the Court of Claims. We modified the judgment, on the law, by excluding from the award to claimant Fleeter Thorpe the amount representing her medical expenses and compensation for emotional harm (44 AD2d 151). The Court of Appeals has reversed the order entered on our decision and remitted the case to us for a review of the facts (37 NY2d 378). Inasmuch as the State does not raise any issue concerning the factual existence of psychic injury to the claimant and does not contest the amount of the award therefor, the judgment of the Court of Claims must be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondents-appellants. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 772, 372 N.Y.S.2d 253, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack