Johnson v. State

520 S.W.3d 513, 2017 WL 2436913, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 538
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 531
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 6, 2017·No. No. ED 104252·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Marquicio Johnson (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object and request a mistrial after a juror allegedly fell asleep during Movant’s trial. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 520 S.W.3d 513, 2017 WL 2436913, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 538 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

520 S.W.3d 513 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.