Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Johnson v. State

553 S.W.2d 499, 1977 Mo. App. LEXIS 2850

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 21, 1977

DocketNo. 38252

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 553 S.W.2d 499 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. State, 553 S.W.2d 499, 1977 Mo. App. LEXIS 2850 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

CLEMENS, Presiding Judge.

Movant’s Rule 27.26 motion was denied by the trial court without an evidentiary hearing and he has appealed.

[500]*500Movant had been found guilty of possessing heroin and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. We affirmed the conviction in State v. Johnson, 529 S.W.2d 658 (Mo.App.1975). Thereafter movant filed his “post-conviction motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and sentence.”

We limit our review to deciding whether the trial court’s order is clearly erroneous. Rule 27.26(j).

The only ground in movant’s motion challenges the original search and seizure of his briefcase. In McCrary v. State, 529 S.W.2d 467[3] (Mo.App.1975) we ruled that “a claim of illegal search is not cognizable in 27.26 proceedings.” Further, this point was adjudicated on appeal and cannot be reconsidered in a post-conviction proceeding. Cochran v. State, 545 S.W.2d 710[1] (Mo.App.1975).

The state’s motion to retax costs is denied.

Judgment affirmed.

DOWD and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI