Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Johnson v. State

198 N.W.2d 522, 293 Minn. 529, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1279

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 23, 1972·No. No. 43171·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant, convicted of simple robbery, appeals from the order denying postconviction relief, claiming that he should be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea, upon which the conviction was based, because (1) he was not informed that if he went to trial he would have a right to confront and cross-examine his accusers; and (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel. There is no merit in these claims.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant, convicted of simple robbery, appeals from the order denying postconviction relief, claiming that he should be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea, upon which the conviction was based, because (1) he was not informed that if he went to trial he would have a right to confront and cross-examine his accusers; and (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel. There is no merit in these claims.

Affirmed.

Johnson v. State, 198 N.W.2d 522, 293 Minn. 529, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1279 (Mich. 1972).

Pincite

198 N.W.2d 522 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.