Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Johnson v. State

198 N.W.2d 522, 293 Minn. 529, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1279

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 23, 1972

DocketNo. 43171

StatusPublished

This text of 198 N.W.2d 522 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. State, 198 N.W.2d 522, 293 Minn. 529, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1279 (Mich. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant, convicted of simple robbery, appeals from the order denying postconviction relief, claiming that he should be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea, upon which the conviction was based, because (1) he was not informed that if he went to trial he would have a right to confront and cross-examine his accusers; and (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel. There is no merit in these claims.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant, convicted of simple robbery, appeals from the order denying postconviction relief, claiming that he should be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea, upon which the conviction was based, because (1) he was not informed that if he went to trial he would have a right to confront and cross-examine his accusers; and (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel. There is no merit in these claims.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 N.W.2d 522, 293 Minn. 529, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-minn-1972.