Johnson v. State

326 N.E.2d 605, 164 Ind. App. 139, 1975 Ind. App. LEXIS 1122
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 157 Ind. App. 105
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided May 7, 1975·No. No. 2-174A41·Published

Opinion

White, J.

Appellant was tried by jury, found guilty of robbery, and sentenced to an indeterminate term of ten to twenty-five years.

The evidence most favorable to the State shows that an ice cream store was robbed by two men, one carrying a gun, at a time when there were no customers and only two employees in the store. The two employees each identified appellant as one of the robbers, the one with the gun. Appellant claims the verdict is contrary to law and not sustained by sufficient evidence in that the two employees were not reliable witnesses, one being nervous and excitable and the testimony of the other being “flimsy”. (Appellant presented no evidence himself.)

It is not for this Court to resolve questions of credibility of witnesses. Asher v. State (1969), 253 Ind. 25, 27, 244 N.E.2d 89, 90. “It is for the jury to pass on [these] witness [es]’ ability to accurately recall [their] assailant, and the jury has spoken on this matter by the verdict in this case.” Bryant v. State (1972), 257 Ind. 679, 681, 278 N.E.2d 576, 577.

The judgment is affirmed.

Sullivan, P.J., and Buchanan, J., concur.

Note.—Reported at 326 N.E.2d 605.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 326 N.E.2d 605, 164 Ind. App. 139, 1975 Ind. App. LEXIS 1122 (Ind. Ct. App. 1975).

326 N.E.2d 605 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Asher v. State
244 N.E.2d 89 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1969)
Bryant v. State
278 N.E.2d 576 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1972)