Johnson v. State
Opinion
Appellant was convicted under an affidavit in three counts, charging him with (1) .driving a motor vehicle while under, the influence of intoxicating liquor, (2) reckless driving, and (3) public intoxication.
The sole error assigned is the overruling of his motion for a new trial. All questions sought to be presented under the motion for a new trial depend upon the evidence, which is not in the record.
Therefore nothing is before this court.
Judgment affirmed.
Bobbitt, Emmert, Draper, and Gilkison, JJ., concur.
Note. — Reported in 119 N. E. 2d 717.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
119 N.E.2d 717 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.