Johnson v. State
This text of 14 Ind. 574 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the time Lawrence v. The State, 10 Ind. R. 453, was tried, the Court of Common Pleas had jurisdiction only of misdemeanors; and in that class of offenses, a separate trial was not a matter of right. It was a matter of right on the trial of felonies in the Circuit Cofírt. In that Court all trials were upon indictment.
But by the act of 1859 (Laws of 1859, pp. 94, 95), the Common Pleas is vested with jurisdiction, in certain cases, of felonies. They are to be tried upon informations; but the trial is to be subject to all the incidents that might attend it in the Circuit Court. One of those incidents, in that Court, would.be a separate trial, if demanded, to be granted as a matter of right. The separate trial should have been allowed.
The judgment is reversed, the cause remanded for a separate trial, and the keeper of the state prison to be notified to bring up the prisoners.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Ind. 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-ind-1860.