Johnson v. State Highway Commission

281 U.S. 691, 50 S. Ct. 238
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 3, 1930
DocketNo. 538
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 281 U.S. 691 (Johnson v. State Highway Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. State Highway Commission, 281 U.S. 691, 50 S. Ct. 238 (1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, [692]*6921925 (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Mr. L. G. Southard for appellants. Messrs. John M. Daniel, Attorney General of South Carolina, Cordie Page and J. Ivey Humphrey, Assistant Attorneys General, William C. Wolfe, Mendel L. Smith, R. E. Whiting, and C. C. Wyche on the brief for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCollum v. Snipes
49 S.E.2d 12 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 U.S. 691, 50 S. Ct. 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-highway-commission-scotus-1930.