Johnson v. State Highway Commission

281 U.S. 691, 50 S. Ct. 238
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 3, 1930·No. No. 538·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, [692]*6921925 (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Mr. L. G. Southard for appellants. Messrs. John M. Daniel, Attorney General of South Carolina, Cordie Page and J. Ivey Humphrey, Assistant Attorneys General, William C. Wolfe, Mendel L. Smith, R. E. Whiting, and C. C. Wyche on the brief for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State Highway Commission, 281 U.S. 691, 50 S. Ct. 238 (1930).

281 U.S. 691 (Johnson v. State Highway Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCollum v. Snipes
49 S.E.2d 12 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1948)