Johnson v. State

13 S.E.2d 116, 64 Ga. App. 334, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 46
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 7, 1941·No. 28629.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Gardner, J.

The evidence was sufficient to show what constituted a lottery known as a number game, such as that being operated, as was indicated by the tickets, and was sufficient to indicate such recent use as would prevent the bar of the statute as to the offense of lottery. Connecting the defendant with these tickets were the facts that when the officers went to her home and while in the house the defendant went to a bed and secured the tickets from concealment and attempted to destroy them, and admitted to the officers, when asked whether the house was hers, that her husband had started paying for it and she was attempting to finish paying for it, together with the further facts that at the moment she was then in control of the house and of the tickets and was attempting to. destroy the tickets.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 13 S.E.2d 116, 64 Ga. App. 334, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 46 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941).

13 S.E.2d 116 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pickering v. State
185 S.E.2d 614 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Sears v. State
184 S.E.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Nicholas v. State
114 Ga. App. 306 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Nickolas v. State
151 S.E.2d 168 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Marshman v. State
76 S.E.2d 443 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)