Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Johnson v. State

128 S.E. 586, 34 Ga. App. 180, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 125

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 22, 1925

Docket16499

StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.E. 586 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. State, 128 S.E. 586, 34 Ga. App. 180, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 125 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The excerpts from the charge of the court which are complained of, when considered in connection with the remainder of the charge and the facts of the case, disclose no material error.

2. The ground of the motion for a new trial complaining of the admission of certain testimony is too incomplete to be considered by this court, since the question of the materiality of the evidence admitted can not be decided without a reference to other parts of the record. Thompson v. State, 118 Ga. 330 (2) (45 S. E. 410); Smith v. State, 126 Ga. 803 (2) (55 S. E. 1024).

3. The remaining ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, and the general grounds of the motion, are not argued or insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and therefore are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI