Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Johnson v. State

112 S.E. 652, 28 Ga. App. 640, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 747

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 13, 1922

Docket13509

StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 652 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. State, 112 S.E. 652, 28 Ga. App. 640, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 747 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The single assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is upon the overruling of the motion for a new trial, which contained only the usual general grounds. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing the grant of a new

trial. Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Indictment for robbery; from Bibb superior court — Judge Mathews. March 18, 1922.

Hubert F. Rawls, for plaintiff in error. Charles H. Garrett, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI