Johnson v. State
This text of 85 S.E. 81 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. No reference being made in the brief of the plaintiff in error to the exception taken to the overruling of the demurrer attacking the sufficiency of the indictment, that exception will be treated as abandoned.
2. Under a ruling by a majority of the court in Paulk v. State, 5 Ga. App. 573 (63 S. E. 659), there is material variation in the allegations of the indictment and the proof offered in support thereof.
3. The instruction to which exception is taken, when considered in connection with the charge of the court as a whole, is not materially erroneous.
4. There was sufficient evidence upon which to base a verdict of guilty; and this verdict, having the approval of the trial judge, will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 S.E. 81, 16 Ga. App. 233, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-gactapp-1915.