Johnson v. State
This text of 63 S.E. 533 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This court has no jurisdiction of a bill of exceptions which has not been presented and filed in accordance with the statute; and hence it becomes its duty to dismiss a writ of error, even in the absence of a formal motion to dismiss, when the-statutory prerequisites have not been complied with. After the court had agreed upon a judgment on the merits in the present case (an affirmance, by the way; so that the plaintiff in error is-not hurt very much after all), we discovered that the clerk’s entry of filing on the bill of exceptions was dated more than fifteen days-after the day on which the judge signed the certificate to the bilL of exceptions; and under Cook v. State, 120 Ga. 137 (47 S. E. 562), this is fatal to jurisdiction in this court.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 S.E. 533, 5 Ga. App. 490, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-gactapp-1909.