Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State

127 S.E. 285, 160 Ga. 77, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 87
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 28, 1925·No. No. 4255·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

1. The evidence being insufficient to support the verdict finding the defendant guilty, it was contrary to law.

2. In view of the holding in the preceding headnote, the assignments of error predicated upon the charge of the court need not he considered.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, O. J., dissenting. Culpepper & Murphy and B. C. Johnson, for plaintiff in error. George M. Napier, attorney-general, E. M. Owen, solicitor-general, T. B. Gress, assistant attorney-general, E. J. Beagan, and E. F. Dupree, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 127 S.E. 285, 160 Ga. 77, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 87 (Ga. 1925).

127 S.E. 285 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Suber v. State
168 S.E. 585 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Griffith v. State
168 S.E. 235 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)