Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Johnson v. State

127 S.E. 285, 160 Ga. 77, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 87

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 28, 1925

DocketNo. 4255

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 127 S.E. 285 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. State, 127 S.E. 285, 160 Ga. 77, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 87 (Ga. 1925).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

1. The evidence being insufficient to support the verdict finding the defendant guilty, it was contrary to law.

2. In view of the holding in the preceding headnote, the assignments of error predicated upon the charge of the court need not he considered.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, O. J., dissenting. Culpepper & Murphy and B. C. Johnson, for plaintiff in error. George M. Napier, attorney-general, E. M. Owen, solicitor-general, T. B. Gress, assistant attorney-general, E. J. Beagan, and E. F. Dupree, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI