Johnson v. State

143 So. 2d 540, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3069
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 So. 2d 798
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 1962·No. No. 61-396·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant and a woman companion were informed against, charged with attempted breaking and entering a dwelling house with intent to commit the felony of grand larceny. They were tried before a jury. Appellant was found guilty and was sentenced to five years confinement. We have considered the record and the briefs and conclude that his appeal is without merit. The motion to suppress evidence consisting of certain tools was properly denied. Testimony relating to the search was sufficient to establish it was made after and incident to the arrest and that there were reasonable grounds for belief a felony had been committed by appellant. Sections 901.15, 901.21, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Brown v. [541]*541State, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 479. See also, Chacon v. State, Fla.1957, 102 So.2d 578. The verdict was amply supported by the evidence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 143 So. 2d 540, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3069 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

143 So. 2d 540 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
46 So. 2d 479 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1950)
Chacon v. State
102 So. 2d 578 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)