Johnson v. State

48 Fla. Supp. 2d 15
CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
DecidedMarch 25, 1991
DocketCase No. 90-2690-AC-A (Lower Court Case No. 90-4577-MM-A-41)
StatusPublished

This text of 48 Fla. Supp. 2d 15 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. State, 48 Fla. Supp. 2d 15 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1991).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

At trial the defense attorney questioned the officer about what defendant said at the time of his arrest and why the officer had not included the statements in his report. The officer replied, “they weren’t confessing what they had done, so I did not write it down.” The defense attorney then made a Motion for Mistrial claiming the officer had improperly commented on defendant’s right to remain silent. Because the comment on defendant’s exercise of his Fifth Amendment [16]*16privilege was invited by the defendant, he cannot seek reversal based on that comment. Clark v State, 363 So.2d 331, 335 (Fla. 1978).

AFFIRMED. McNEAL, R., BOOTH, J., SINGELTARY, G., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. State
363 So. 2d 331 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Fla. Supp. 2d 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-flacirct-1991.