Johnson v. State

193 So. 547, 141 Fla. 464, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 804
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 2, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 193 So. 547 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. State, 193 So. 547, 141 Fla. 464, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 804 (Fla. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On writ of error we review judgment of conviction of the crime of incest.

If the evidence given by the alleged victim was such that a jury of reasonable men believed it, it was sufficient to support the verdict. The juiy evidently did believe it and the able Circuit Judge who saw the witnesses and heard them testify endorsed the finding of guilty by refusing to grant a new trial.

The entire record has been examined and the able briefs duly considered and we fail to find reflected therein any reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 So. 547, 141 Fla. 464, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-fla-1940.