Johnson v. State
60 Fla. 18
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 57 Fla. 18 →
Opinion
This cause having been duly considered, by the court, and Mr. Chief Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Taylor and Mr. Justice Hocker being of opinion that the [19]*19judgment should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Shackle-ford, Mr. Justice Cockrell aud Mr. Justice Parkhill are of opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the judgment should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton, v. McClung, 47 Fla., 224, 37 South. Rep., 51, and it is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. State, 60 Fla. 18 (Fla. 1910).
60 Fla. 18 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Griffith v. Alcocke
37 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)