Johnson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Johnson v. State

100 S.W.3d 739, 352 Ark. 313, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 131

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 13, 2003

DocketCR 03-170

StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.W.3d 739 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. State, 100 S.W.3d 739, 352 Ark. 313, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 131 (Ark. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

John Joplin, a full-time, state-salaried pubriam. in Sebastian County, was appointed by the trial court to represent appellant, Carl Johnson, an indigent defendant, on the charge of murder in the first degree. Following a trial held on November 15, 2002, appellant was found guilty and sentenced to serve forty years in the Arkansas Department of Correction and to pay a fine of $15,000. A timely notice of appeal was filed with the circuit clerk, pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. — Crim. 10, and the record was timely lodged in this court.

Mr. Joplin now asks to be relieved as counsel for appellant in this criminal appeal, based upon the cases of Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.484 (2000) (holding that full-time, state-salaried public defenders were ineligible for compensation for their work on appeal) and Tester v. State, 341 Ark. 281, 16 S.W.3d 227 (2000) (per curiam) (relieving appellant’s court-appointed public defender and appointing new counsel on appeal).

Since the time of those decisions, the law was changed by the General Assembly. Act 1370 of 2001 provides in part: “[PJersons employed as full-time public defenders, who are not provided a state-funded secretary, may also seek compensation for appellate work from the Arkansas Supreme Court or the Arkansas Court of Appeals.” That provision is now codified as Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Supp. 2001).

Mr. Joplin’s motion states that he is provided with a full-time, state-funded secretary. Accordingly, we grant his motion to withdraw as attorney. Mr. Tim Cullen will be substituted as attorney for appellant in this matter. The Clerk will establish a new briefing schedule.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

John Joplin, a full-time, state-salaried pubriam. in Sebastian County, was appointed by the trial court to represent appellant, Carl Johnson, an indigent defendant, on the charge of murder in the first degree. Following a trial held on November 15, 2002, appellant was found guilty and sentenced to serve forty years in the Arkansas Department of Correction and to pay a fine of $15,000. A timely notice of appeal was filed with the circuit clerk, pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. — Crim. 10, and the record was timely lodged in this court.

Mr. Joplin now asks to be relieved as counsel for appellant in this criminal appeal, based upon the cases of Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.484 (2000) (holding that full-time, state-salaried public defenders were ineligible for compensation for their work on appeal) and Tester v. State, 341 Ark. 281, 16 S.W.3d 227 (2000) (per curiam) (relieving appellant’s court-appointed public defender and appointing new counsel on appeal).

Since the time of those decisions, the law was changed by the General Assembly. Act 1370 of 2001 provides in part: “[PJersons employed as full-time public defenders, who are not provided a state-funded secretary, may also seek compensation for appellate work from the Arkansas Supreme Court or the Arkansas Court of Appeals.” That provision is now codified as Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Supp. 2001).

Mr. Joplin’s motion states that he is provided with a full-time, state-funded secretary. Accordingly, we grant his motion to withdraw as attorney. Mr. Tim Cullen will be substituted as attorney for appellant in this matter. The Clerk will establish a new briefing schedule.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 S.W.3d 739, 352 Ark. 313, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-ark-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack