Johnson v. State
This text of 936 S.W.2d 75 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Floyd D. Johnson, by his attorney, L.D. Gibson, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. The Clerk refused to docket the record concerning Mr. Johnson’s conviction because it revealed that the notice of appeal was filed before Mr. Johnson’s motion for new trial was deemed denied. Mr. Gibson accepts responsibility for the failure to file a timely notice of appeal. We treat the motion for rule on the clerk as motion for belated appeal in this instance.
Failure of counsel to perfect an appeal for a defendant who wishes to appeal constitutes good cause for granting a belated appeal. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is granted.
A copy of this opinion will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
936 S.W.2d 75, 327 Ark. 33, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-ark-1997.