Johnson v. State

911 S.W.2d 593, 322 Ark. 818, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 739
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 321 Ark. 117
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided December 18, 1995·No. CR 95-1227·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Reginald Johnson, by his attorney, Tell Hulett, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that he untimely filed a notice of appeal in this cause due to a mistake on his part. Under our rules the notice of appeal was of no effect. Ark. R. App. R 4.

We will treat petitioner’s motion as one for a belated appeal which we grant upon counsel’s admission of error. We direct that a copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Woods v. State, 316 Ark. 705, 873 S.W.2d 563 (1994).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 911 S.W.2d 593, 322 Ark. 818, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 739 (Ark. 1995).

911 S.W.2d 593 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woods v. State
873 S.W.2d 562 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)