Johnson v. State
686 S.W.2d 443, 285 Ark. 347, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 1914
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 288 Ark. 101 →
Opinion
dissenting. I would grant the writ because I think all parties are entitled to know whether they are trying a misdemeanor or a felony. The time and money saved is great if we hold that the offense is a misdemeanor. On the other hand, if we hold it is a felony no one is injured because all trial courts have plenty of cases to try without these. Needless to say an accused will not suffer harm unless he is being held in custody awaiting trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. State, 686 S.W.2d 443, 285 Ark. 347, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 1914 (Ark. 1985).
686 S.W.2d 443 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.