Johnson v. State

32 Ark. 309
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 32 Ark. 309 (Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. State, 32 Ark. 309 (Ark. 1877).

Opinion

Harrison, J.:

The appellant, Henry Johnson, was convicted in the Arkansas. Circuit Court, of the crime of bigamy, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for three years.

After the State had examined several witnesses, the court,, against the objection of the defendant, suspended the trial, and allowed the jury to separate, from Tuesday until Friday, that the-State might procure the attendance of a witness.

The suspension of the proceedings in a trial, is within the-sound discretion of the court, and we are not prepared to say, there was any abuse of its discretion in this case.

And though the rule formerly was different, the jury may now, by a provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure, be permitted by the court to separate, either before or after the case is submitted to them. Code of Crim. Proced., secs. 243, 246;: Gantt’s Digest secs. 1938, 1941.

As it is possible for great prejudice to result from such separations, the discretion of the court, in allowing .it, should be, especially in trials for felony, exercised with the utmost caution r and for any apparent abuse of it, this court would not hesitate reverse the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Fallis v. Vestrem
1974 OK CR 184 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1974)
Borland v. State
249 S.W. 591 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1923)
Burns v. State
1913 OK CR 24 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1913)
Armstrong v. State
144 S.W. 195 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Havill v. United States
1911 OK CR 86 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1911)
Armstrong v. State
1909 OK CR 85 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1909)
Johnson v. State
59 S.W. 34 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1900)
Hamilton v. State
36 S.W. 1054 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Ark. 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-state-ark-1877.