Johnson v. State

111 So. 50, 21 Ala. App. 623, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 363
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 14, 1926·No. 4 Div. 208.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of having prohibited liquor in his possession.

The prosecution having been begun upon an affidavit and warrant in the county court, it whs not necessary to even file a complaint in the circuit court. Code 1923, § 4646.

There was no error in allowing the state’s witness Furlow to state that appellant’s premises were searched under the authority of a search warrant. True, under our law it made no difference, but it surely cannot be said to be improper for the jury to have the information.

We find nowhere any prejudicial error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 111 So. 50, 21 Ala. App. 623, 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 363 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

111 So. 50 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
168 So. 602 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1936)
Gilbert v. State
142 So. 682 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1932)
Boykin v. State
129 So. 491 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)