Johnson v. State

110 So. 922, 21 Ala. App. 679
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 Ala. App. 598
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 9, 1926·No. 4 Div. 76.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Upon an indictment charging the defendant with a violation of the prohibition law, he was convicted as charged, and the jury assessed a fine of $250, for which the defendant and sureties confessed judgment. The court added six months’ hard labor for the county, and appellant was duly sentenced accordingly. From the judgment of conviction he appealed. The appeal here is upon the reeo'rd proper, there being no bill of exceptions. Upon examination, the record is found to be regular in all things. No error being apparent on the record, the judgment of conviction appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 110 So. 922, 21 Ala. App. 679 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

110 So. 922 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.