Johnson v. State
71 So. 79, 14 Ala. App. 62, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 23
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Ala. App. 140 →
Opinion
A careful reading of the evidence set out in the bill of exceptions does not seem to the members of the court to show sufficient facts affording an inference of guilt of any crime charged against the defendant in the complaint, or affidavit, upon which he was tried, upon which to base, or justify, a finding and judgment of conviction.
It follows that the judgment of conviction, from which the appeal is prosecuted, must be reversed, and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. State, 71 So. 79, 14 Ala. App. 62, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 23 (Ala. Ct. App. 1916).
71 So. 79 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.