Johnson v. State

597 So. 2d 1306, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 169, 1992 WL 94997
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 555 So. 2d 818
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 13, 1992·No. CR-89-379·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM ALABAMA ' SUPREME COURT

PATTERSON, Presiding Judge.

Pursuant to our supreme court’s directive in Ex parte Johnson, 597 So.2d 1305 (Ala.1991), this cause is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of conducting a new sentence hearing. The trial court shall take necessary action to see that the circuit clerk makes due return to this court at the earliest possible time and within 42 days of the release of this opinion. Since Johnson is not indigent, Johnson shall make financial arrangements with the court reporter immediately after the hearing, in the event Johnson wishes to have a transcript of that proceeding considered with the trial court’s return to remand.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. State, 597 So. 2d 1306, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 169, 1992 WL 94997 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

597 So. 2d 1306 (Johnson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Johnson
597 So. 2d 1305 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1991)