Johnson v. Star

47 S.W.2d 608
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. Star. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 Tex. 195
Texas Supreme Court·Decided March 23, 1932·No. No. 18589·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District in this case, 44 S.W.(2d) 429, is in conflict with that of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District in the case of Johnson v. Chapman Milling Co., 37 S.W.(2d) 776. We are convinced, however, that the opinion of the first-named court in the instant case is correct, and that the questions at issue have been definitely settled by this court in the cases of Patty-Joiner & Eubank Co. v. Cummins, 93 Tex. 598, 67 S. W. 566, and Haijek & Simecek v. Luck, 96 Tex. 517, 74 S. W. 305.

We accordingly refuse the application for writ of error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Star, 47 S.W.2d 608 (Tex. 1932).

47 S.W.2d 608 (Johnson v. Star) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Chapman Milling Co.
37 S.W.2d 776 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Haijek & Simecek v. Luck
74 S.W. 305 (Texas Supreme Court, 1903)
Patty-Joiner & Eubank Co. v. Cummins
57 S.W. 566 (Texas Supreme Court, 1900)
Star v. Johnson
44 S.W.2d 429 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1931)
State v. May
67 S.W. 566 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1902)