Johnson v. Star Permanent Wave Corp.

237 A.D. 868
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 237 A.D. 868 (Johnson v. Star Permanent Wave Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Star Permanent Wave Corp., 237 A.D. 868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff received from defendant a hair treatment known as a “ permanent wave.” In consideration of a reduced rate charged for the work plaintiff signed a document reading as follows: “ In consideration of the reduced rates given to me by the Star Permanent Wave Corporation of the City of Syracuse, I hereby release and agree to save harmless the Star Permanent Wave Corporation from any and all liability which might arise as a result of any injuries received for any reason while receiving a permanent wave.” The signing was voluntary, no fraud having been practiced by defendant in connection with the transaction. Plaintiff has recovered a judgment for $351 for burns received. The judgment should be reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts, the document quoted being a complete bar to any cause of action in favor of plaintiff. (Anderson v. Erie R. R. Co., 223 N. Y. 277.) Under the circumstances presented the fact that plaintiff did not read the document is immaterial. (Metzger v. Ætna Ins. Co., 227 N. Y. 411, 415, 416.) All concur. Judgment reversed on the law and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boll v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc.
281 A.D. 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 A.D. 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-star-permanent-wave-corp-nyappdiv-1932.