Johnson v. Stansberry

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2006·No. 06-7153·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7153

NATHANIEL K. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Joseph C. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-hc-02049-H)

Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 20, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel K. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel K. Johnson, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed

in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Johnson v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02049-H (E.D.N.C.

June 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Stansberry, (4th Cir. 2006).

Johnson v. Stansberry (Johnson v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241