Johnson v. Stansberry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7153
NATHANIEL K. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Joseph C. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-hc-02049-H)
Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 20, 2006
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel K. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel K. Johnson, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed
in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Johnson v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02049-H (E.D.N.C.
June 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Stansberry (Johnson v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.