Johnson v. Stanfill Drywall Service

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Johnson v. Stanfill Drywall Service

414 So. 2d 24, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20040

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 18, 1982

DocketNo. AF-379

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 414 So. 2d 24 (Johnson v. Stanfill Drywall Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Stanfill Drywall Service, 414 So. 2d 24, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20040 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This workers’ compensation claimant appeals the deputy commissioner’s denial of his claim for temporary total disability benefits. There is no medical testimony that the claimant was unable to work as a result of his accident, and there is no evidence that he sought work during the period for which he seeks temporary disability benefits. This Court has repeatedly held that the requirement that a claimant test his disability in the job market is not obviated by testimony from the claimant that he finds it painful to work. Tallahassee Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. Parramore, 395 So.2d 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) and Mahler v. Lauderdale Lakes National Bank, 322 So.2d 507 (Fla.1975). We accordingly AFFIRM.

MILLS, LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This workers’ compensation claimant appeals the deputy commissioner’s denial of his claim for temporary total disability benefits. There is no medical testimony that the claimant was unable to work as a result of his accident, and there is no evidence that he sought work during the period for which he seeks temporary disability benefits. This Court has repeatedly held that the requirement that a claimant test his disability in the job market is not obviated by testimony from the claimant that he finds it painful to work. Tallahassee Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. Parramore, 395 So.2d 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) and Mahler v. Lauderdale Lakes National Bank, 322 So.2d 507 (Fla.1975). We accordingly AFFIRM.

MILLS, LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

414 So. 2d 24, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-stanfill-drywall-service-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack