Johnson v. Squires

53 Cal. 37
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1878·No. No. 5183·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

By the Court :

The answer of the defendant Squires set up an affirmative defense, upon which, if proven, he would be entitled to a decree in his favor.

The findings of fact do not, in terms, dispose of the issues tendered by this affirmative defense, and they remain undisposed of unless by tho fifth finding. This finding is as follows : “ That all the issues of fact raised by the pleadings in this case arc hereby found and decided in favor of the plaintiffs, and against said defendant.” We do not think this finding sufficient. To say that all the issues of fact raised by the pleadings are found and decided in favor of either party, suggests an inquiry as to what issues are raised by the pleadings—a question often found to be one of no little difficulty to determine, and concerning which, in this case, the views of the Court below may be widely different from our own.

[38]*38We think the finding under consideration as indefinite in its character as the finding that “ all the material allegations of the complaint ” are resolved in favor of a named one or other of the parties, and which we have held insufficient as a finding of fact.

Judgment and order denying new trial reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Squires, 53 Cal. 37 (Cal. 1878).

53 Cal. 37 (Johnson v. Squires) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Imperial Water Co. No. 1 v. Imperial Irrigation District
217 P. 88 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)
Decou v. Howell
214 P. 444 (California Supreme Court, 1923)
Turner v. Turner
203 P. 109 (California Supreme Court, 1921)
Chatfield v. Continental Building & Loan Ass'n
92 P. 1040 (California Court of Appeal, 1907)
Wood v. Broderson
85 P. 490 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1906)
Krug v. F. A. Lux Brewing Co.
61 P. 1125 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
Alameda County v. Crocker
57 P. 766 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Gull River Lumber Co. v. School District No. 39
48 N.W. 427 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1890)
McCormack v. Phillips
34 N.W. 39 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1887)