Johnson v. Social Security Administration

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided September 15, 2021·No. 4:20-cv-01139·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION McCOY LAVAUGHN JOHNSON ** * Plaintiff, ** V. ** No. 4:20-cv-01139-BSM-JJV * KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ** Acting Commissioner, ** Social Security Administration, ** * Defendant. ** ORDER AND JUDGMENT Defendant filed an unopposed Motion to Remand this case (Doc. No. 19) pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1995): The court shall have the power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing. The Commissioner seeks remand to conduct further proceedings and states opposing counsel has no objection to the requested remand. Under the circumstances, a “sentence four” remand is appropriate. Buckner v. Apfel, 213 F.3d 1006, 1010-11 (8th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the Commissioner’s decision is reversed and remanded for action consistent with this opinion. This is a “sentence four” remand within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan vy. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). SO ORDERED this 15th day of September 2021. \ i \ JO rt \ OPP ke / NO —-~ — WNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Social Security Administration, (E.D. Ark. 2021).

Johnson v. Social Security Administration (Johnson v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melkonyan v. Sullivan
501 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1991)