Johnson v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Johnson v. Smith

746 N.W.2d 619

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 9, 2008

Docket135418

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 746 N.W.2d 619 (Johnson v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Smith, 746 N.W.2d 619 (Mich. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

746 N.W.2d 619 (2008)

Dina M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Hollis SMITH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 135418. COA No. 270906.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 9, 2008.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

*620 MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

746 N.W.2d 619 (2008)

Dina M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Hollis SMITH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 135418. COA No. 270906.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 9, 2008.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

*620 MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

746 N.W.2d 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-smith-mich-2008.

Opinion

Dina M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hollis SMITH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Dina M. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Hollis SMITH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.