Johnson v. Smith
This text of Johnson v. Smith (Johnson v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7179
MICHAEL X. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. SMITH, Regional Director; G. BASS, Deputy Warden; M. PATTERSON, Lieutenant; S. BACON, Commanding Officer; A. RONEY, Commanding Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-273-AM)
Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 11, 1996
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael X. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Theresa Bowers, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Johnson v. Smith, No. CA-95-273-AM (E.D. Va. July 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson v. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-smith-ca4-1996.