Johnson v. Singletary
Opinion
The petitioner, Charles Johnson, seeks a writ of habeas corpus based on ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. We grant the petition and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.
In the instant ease, although the petitioner’s trial counsel correctly argued that a departure from the sentencing guidelines cannot be based on prior offenses for which no conviction was obtained, the trial court nonetheless entered a departure sentence. See State v. Tyner, 506 So.2d 405, 406 (Fla.1987). Because the petitioner’s appellate counsel failed to raise this issue on appeal, we agree with the petitioner that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel. Accordingly, we grant the petition and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.
Petition granted; remanded for resentenc-ing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
708 So. 2d 321 (Johnson v. Singletary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.