Johnson v. Silletoe
2 Del. 305
This text of 2 Del. 305 (Johnson v. Silletoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Johnson v. Silletoe, 2 Del. 305 (Del. Ct. App. 1837).
Opinion
said that in general the purposes of justice would be better obtained by allowing a continuance in cases situated similarly with the present, than by forcing on a trial; unless it was suggested by counter affidavit that the plaintiff was in danger of losing his debt by the delay, or other special reason against the continuance.
Cause continued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Del. 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-silletoe-delsuperct-1837.