Johnson v. Shreveport Transit Co.

188 So. 2d 713, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 4937
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 30, 1966
DocketNo. 10624
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 188 So. 2d 713 (Johnson v. Shreveport Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Shreveport Transit Co., 188 So. 2d 713, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 4937 (La. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

AYRES, Judge.

This is a companion case to that of Murray v. Shreveport Transit Company, Inc., No. 10623 on the docket of this court, 188 So.2d 710, with which it was consolidated for trial and which has this day been decided.

The matter of liability was determined adversely to defendant in the consolidated case and consequently there remain for consideration in this case only the questions relating to the amounts which would compensate plaintiffs for their injuries.

Dr. Ray E. King, orthopedist, examined these plaintiffs November 2, 1964, the second day following the accident. At that time Eula Mae Johnson complained of pain in her upper back and neck. On examination Dr. King found she had received muscular sprains involving the trapezius muscles from the base of the neck to the top of the shoulders. With treatment, ill effects were said not to be expected for more than 3-6 weeks.

Dr. King, with reference to Johnie Johnson, found restricted motion in the cervical spine. Left lateral rotation, as well as hyperextension, that is, looking upward, was restricted by 15 percent. The conclusion was reached by Dr. King that this plaintiff had sustained a contusion to the right rib cage and a cervical sprain involving the left erector spinae muscle group; a mild ligamentous and muscular sprain had been superimposed upon arthritic changes in the cervical spine. Plaintiff was found, however, not to be disabled at the time of the examination. Complete recovery was anticipated within a period of six weeks.

Instructions were given these plaintiffs that if their conditions failed to improve they were to again report to Dr. King. However, they did not do so and he never saw them after his initial examination.

For the injuries sustained by these plaintiffs, we think, an award of $250 each constitutes adequate compensation.

Therefore, the judgment appealed is annulled, avoided, reversed, and set aside; and

Accordingly, there is now judgment in favor of plaintiff Johnie Johnson for the sum of $250 and in favor of plaintiff Eula Mae Johnson for $250 against the defendant Shreveport Transit Company, Inc., with 5 percent per annum interest thereon from judicial demand until paid, and for all costs, including the cost of this appeal.

Reversed and rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lemoine v. American Employers Insurance Co.
238 So. 2d 233 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1970)
Dugas v. Travelers Insurance Co.
228 So. 2d 320 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1969)
Murray v. Shreveport Transit Co.
188 So. 2d 710 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 So. 2d 713, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 4937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-shreveport-transit-co-lactapp-1966.