Johnson v. Shinseki

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. Shinseki. Read the opinion of the Court — 440 Fed. Appx. 919
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 9, 2012·No. 2012-7038·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit JAMES M. JOHNSON, Claimant-Appellant, ' V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, __ Respondent-Appellee. 2012-7038 ` Appea1 from the United States Court of Appea1s for Veterans C1aims in case n0. 11-2476, Judge LaWrence B. Hagel. ON MOTION ORDER James M. Johnson moves without opposition to dis- miss his appeal Upon consideration thereof IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. The appeal is dismissed

JOHNSON V. DVA (2) Each side shall bear its own costs 2 FoR THE CoURT /s/ Jan Horba1_\/1 Date J an Horba1y C1erk cc: John F. Cameron, Esq. Tara K. Hogan, Esq. s21 Issued As A Mandate: ,__ 0 9 2012 FlLED U.S. CUURT 0F APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL ClRCUIT ` MAR U 9 2012 JANHORBAL¥ CLEBK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Shinseki, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Johnson v. Shinseki (Johnson v. Shinseki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.