Johnson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided February 19, 2015·No. 14-159·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-159V Filed: January 27, 2015

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED KELLY JOHNSON, * * Special Master Dorsey Petitioner, * * v. * * Joint Stipulation on Damages; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Influenza (Flu) vaccine; Guillain- AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Barrė Syndrome (GBS). * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Danielle Anne Strait, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PC, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Darryl R. Wishard, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION1

On February 27, 2014, Kelly Johnson (“petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). Petitioner alleged that she suffered from Guillain-Barrė syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine that she received on January 17, 2013. See Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleged that she experienced the residual effects of these injuries for more than six months. Id. at 2.

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b).

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.

1 On January 27, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation.

Respondent denies that the flu vaccine either caused or significantly aggravated petitioner’s alleged injuries or any other injury, and denies that petitioner’s current disabilities are the result of a vaccine-related injury. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

The parties stipulated that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

A lump sum of $32,500.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a).

Stipulation ¶ 8.

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 I N THE UNI TE D STATES COURT OF FE DERAL CLA I M S OFFI C E OF SPEC I AL MASTER S

) KELLY JOH SON. ) ) Petitioner. ) o. 14-1 59V ECF ) V. ) Special Master Dorsey ) SEC RETARY OF HEALTH ) AN D HUMA SE RV ICES, ) ) Responde nt. ) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ) STI PULATION

The parties hereby sti pulate to the fo llow ing mat1ers:

I. Petitioner. Kelly Johnson, fil ed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

ati onal Vaccine Injury Compensa tion Program. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- I0 to 34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation fo r inju ries alleged ly related to petitioner' s receipt

of the influenza (.. flu ..) vacc ine. which is contai ned in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"). 42

C.F. R. § I00.J(a).

2. On January 17. 20 13. petitioner rece ived the flu vacc ine in her right arm.

3. The flu vaccine was administe red within the United tates.

4. Peti tioner alleges that. as a resu lt of rece iving the flu vaccine. she suffered from

GuiIlai n-Barre syndrome (..GBS.. ). and that he experienced symptoms of this inj ury for more

than six month s.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or cttlement of a civ il action

for damages as a result of her alleged inj uries. 6. Respondent denies that the flu vacc ine either caused or significan tl y aggravated

petiti oner' s alleged injuries or any other injury. and deni es that petiti oner's current d isabi lities

are the result o f a vaccine-related inj ury.

7. M aintaining their above-stated pos iti ons. the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be senled and that a decision should be entered award ing the

compensa tion described in paragraph 8 o f thi Stipu lation.

8. As soon as practicabl e alter an entry o f j udgment reflecti ng a deci ion con istent

w ith the term s o f thi s Stipu lat ion. and after petitioner has filed an election to receive

com pensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 l (a)( I ). the Secretary of H ea lth and Human

Services w ill issue the fo llowing vacc ine compensa ti on payment :

A lump sum of $32.500.0 0. in the fo rm o f a check payabl e to petitioner. T hi s amount represents compensa tion for al I damages that wou Id be ava ilable under 42 U .. C. § 300aa-1 5(a).

9. As soon as practicab le after the entry o f j udgment on entitlement in th is case. and

after pet itioner has filed both a proper and tim ely election to receive compensa tion pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 2 I (a)( I ). and an applicatio n. the parties w ill submit to furth er proceed ings

before the special master to award reasonabl e attorn eys' fees and costs incurred in proceed ing

upon thi s petition.

I 0. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensa tion to be provided pu rsuant to

thi s tipulat ion is not for any item s or serv ices for \\h ich the Program is not prim ari ly liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- I 5(g). to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonab ly be

expected to be made under any State compensa ti on programs. insu rance pol icies. Federal or

State health benefits programs (other than T itl e X I X of the Soc ial Securi ty Act (42 U .. C.

§ 1396 et seq.)). or by entities that prov ide hea lth services on a pre- pa id bas is.

2 11 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2015).

Johnson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Johnson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a