Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Johnson v. Schultz

Johnson v. Schultz

676 S.E.2d 475, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 583, 2009 WL 1042632
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. Schultz. Read the opinion of the Court — 364 N.C. 90 →
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 16, 2009·No. 75A09·Published

Opinion

676 S.E.2d 475 (2009)

JOHNSON
v.
SCHULTZ, et al.

No. 75A09.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 16, 2009.

James K. Pendergrass, Jr., Raleigh, for Schultz, et al.

Gordon C. Woodruff, Smithfield, for Johnson.

Katherine Jean, Raleigh, David R. Johnson, Deputy Counsel, for NC State Bar.

Robert B. McNeill, Charlotte, for NCLTA.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of April 2009 by NCLTA for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of April 2009."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Schultz, 676 S.E.2d 475, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 583, 2009 WL 1042632 (N.C. 2009).

676 S.E.2d 475 (Johnson v. Schultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.